pregleda

The International Legal Status of Formosa


Cena:
1.999 din
Stanje: Polovan bez oštećenja
Garancija: Ne
Isporuka: Pošta
CC paket (Pošta)
Post Express
Lično preuzimanje
Plaćanje: Tekući račun (pre slanja)
PostNet (pre slanja)
Pouzećem
Lično
Grad: Smederevska Palanka,
Smederevska Palanka
Prodavac

bondolica (4250)

PREMIUM član
Član je postao Premium jer:
- ima 100 jedinstvenih pozitivnih ocena od kupaca,
- tokom perioda od 6 meseci uplati minimum 20.000 dinara na svoj Limundo račun.

99,82% pozitivnih ocena

Pozitivne: 13836

  Pošalji poruku

Svi predmeti člana


Kupindo zaštita

ISBN: Ostalo
Godina izdanja: 2222
Jezik: Engleski
Autor: Strani

dobro stanje, ponegde podvlačena vidi sliku
Can two-Chinas co-exist in the present world order? In a sense they co-exist now-Free China in Taiwan (Formosa) and Communist China on the mainland. Barring a military showdown, this situation could remain for years to come. However, if we seek to put Free China and Communist China on some permanent basis and give them interna­ tional juridical status as abiding and separate entities, then we are faced with serious difficulties. Free China and Communist China co­ exist at present simply because neither can effectively alter the situa­ tion. Each is backed by a power bloc that recognizes the legal existence of only one of these political regimes. The United States does not re­ cognize Peiping, even though it has conducted meetings on the ambas­ sadorial level with the Regime for several years. In a corresponding way, the Soviet bloc of nations refuses to recognize Nationalist China. The situation is very similar to that of two-Germanys, two-Koreas and two-Vietnams. To seek a solution to this political impasse, it is suggested that a `Sino-Formosan State` or some kind of `self-determination` by the Formosans be instituted. This was first expressed by Chester Bowles in his article `The China Problem Reconsidered` (Foreign Affairs, April 1960), and supported by John Carter Vincent in his letter to the editor of the New York Times (December 7,1961). The Conlon Report of 1959 held the same posi. tion. Also, Arnold J.

pogledajte i ponudu prodavca Spengler a ako tamo nađete nešto za vas, slanje i plaćanje će vam biti objedinjeni,

Predmet: 78987277
dobro stanje, ponegde podvlačena vidi sliku
Can two-Chinas co-exist in the present world order? In a sense they co-exist now-Free China in Taiwan (Formosa) and Communist China on the mainland. Barring a military showdown, this situation could remain for years to come. However, if we seek to put Free China and Communist China on some permanent basis and give them interna­ tional juridical status as abiding and separate entities, then we are faced with serious difficulties. Free China and Communist China co­ exist at present simply because neither can effectively alter the situa­ tion. Each is backed by a power bloc that recognizes the legal existence of only one of these political regimes. The United States does not re­ cognize Peiping, even though it has conducted meetings on the ambas­ sadorial level with the Regime for several years. In a corresponding way, the Soviet bloc of nations refuses to recognize Nationalist China. The situation is very similar to that of two-Germanys, two-Koreas and two-Vietnams. To seek a solution to this political impasse, it is suggested that a `Sino-Formosan State` or some kind of `self-determination` by the Formosans be instituted. This was first expressed by Chester Bowles in his article `The China Problem Reconsidered` (Foreign Affairs, April 1960), and supported by John Carter Vincent in his letter to the editor of the New York Times (December 7,1961). The Conlon Report of 1959 held the same posi. tion. Also, Arnold J.
78987277 The International Legal Status of Formosa

LimundoGrad koristi kolačiće u statističke i marketinške svrhe. Nastavkom korišćenja sajta smatramo da ste pristali na upotrebu kolačića. Više informacija.